Aquaculture Impact Mitigation and Lobster Reintroduction Practices

bogavante en arrecife_ Manuel E. Garci - Pablo Sanchez-Jerez

Restored Species: Homarus gammarus and soft bottom benthic ecosystems

IMG_20231123_120751_00_025_2023-11-28_17-53-06_screenshot (1)

Main Stressor: Aquaculture

Practices for Aquaculture Impact Mitigation and Lobster Reintroduction Restoration

Black White Grey Round Monogram Typography Logo

Assessment Phase

Consider historical abundance of populations

    • Review available fisheries records, scientific surveys, and local ecological knowledge to reconstruct past lobster population levels 1

Consider causes of decline

    • Identify key drivers such as overfishing, habitat degradation, climate change, and pollution 2,3

Assess the current status of lobsters in the target area

    • Examples: densities, habitat quality, and environmental pressures 4

If lacking or inconsistent historical records, use the following to guide planning

    • Structured ecological assessments
    • Participatory monitoring
    • Traditional ecological knowledge from small-scale fisheries 
lobster 1
Black White Grey Round Monogram Typography Logo (1)

Planning and Design Phase

laboratory_2

Consider several key factors when selecting a restoration site

    • Habitat suitability
    • Water quality
    • Hydrodynamics
    • Food availability
    • Existing lobster presence
    • Protection status
    • Accessibility

Whenever possible, lobsters should originate from the target restoration area to preserve local traits 5

Broodstock collection should prioritise large effective population sizes with rotational breeding strategies 6

Plan for regular assessment of genetic diversity in released populations 7

Best practices for selecting and managing broodstock

    • Health screen 8,9
    • Diverse size classes 10
    • Balanced sex ratios 11,12
    • Origin documentation 7
Black White Grey Round Monogram Typography Logo (2)

Implementation Phase

Utilise special hatchery facilities required to produce juveniles

Integrate elements of environmental enrichment and microbial communities to support development of wild traits

Choose releasing ages and habitats that are compatible to maximise population establishment

Elements to consider for successful releasing

    • Temperature acclimation 26
    • Handling tolerance training 27,28
    • Seasonal timing: Spring or early summer with water temperatures above 12 degrees Celsius 23
    • Optimal substrates
    • Predation risk 21
    • Critical to avoid suboptimal areas

Plan transporation adapted to minimising stress, dehydration, and handling of smaller individuals

Release techniques

    1. Direct seabed placement by divers
      • Preferred method
    2. Phased introduction using temporary protective structures
      • Promotes shelter-seeking behavior during the most vulnerable post-release period 35
    3. Surface release
      • Only for larger juveniles
      • Must be in sheltered, shallow habitats that are immediately accessible
artificial reefs underwater
Black White Grey Round Monogram Typography Logo (4)

Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

Choose appropriate monitoring methods

Develop success criteria for each of the stages of monitoring

Implement a robust data management plan

  • Use standardised protocols
  • Use digital tools to minimise errors
  • Maintain a centralised, secure database
  • Apply appropriate statistical methods that account for environmental variability and baseline conditions
  • Consider developing modelling approaches

Follow an adaptive management framework

  • Set expectations, but remain flexible to changes found through monitoring
  • Regularly review monitoring data to update protocols
  • Adjust strategies and methods from results of monitoring
  • Maintain stakeholder engagement throughout the entire project

Examples of Indicators

artificial_reef_census copia - Pablo Sanchez-Jerez
Black White Grey Round Monogram Typography Logo (7)

Stakeholder Engagement

Engagement is critical to success and long-term viability of lobster restoration

Establish clear governance structures and communication channels

Co-production of knowledge with stakeholders can enhance legitimacy and effectiveness of restoration

Click on the diagram above to learn about who to engage throughout the restoration project!

45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51

Useful Contacts

Pablo Sanchez Jerez

pablo sanchez jul 24

University of Alicante

Laura Leyva

LAURALEYVA

University of Alicante

Paula Daban Losada

PAULA DABAN

University of Vigo

References

1. Spanier E (2015) The utilization of lobsters by humans in the Mediterranean Basin from the prehistoric era to the modern era–an interdisciplinary short review. Athens Journal of Mediterranean Studies, 1:223–234.
2. Agnalt A, Kristiansen T, Jørstad K (2007) Growth, reproductive cycle, and movement of berried European lobsters (Homarus gammarus) in a local stock off southwestern Norway. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64:288–297.
3. Kleiven AR, Espeland SH, Stiansen S, Ono K, Zimmermann F, Olsen EM (2022) Technological creep masks continued decline in a lobster (Homarus gammarus) fishery over a century. Scientific Reports, 12:3318.
4. Sundelöf A, Bartolino V, Ulmestrand M, Cardinale M (2013) Multi-annual fluctuations in reconstructed historical time-series of a European lobster (Homarus gammarus) population disappear at increased exploitation levels. PLOS ONE, 8:e58160.
5. Jørstad KE, Farestveit E (1999) Population genetic structure of lobster (Homarus gammarus) in Norway, and implications for enhancement and sea-ranching operation. Aquaculture, 173:447–457.
6. Jørstad KE, Farestveit E, Kelly E, Triantaphyllidis C (2005) Allozyme variation in European lobster (Homarus gammarus) throughout its distribution range. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 39:515–526.
7. De Wit P, Svanberg L, Casties I, Eriksson SP, Sundell K, André C (2022) Single nucleotide polymorphisms are suitable for assessing the success of restocking efforts of the European lobster (Homarus gammarus). Conservation Genetics Resources, 14:47–52.
8. Egidius E (1972) On the internal bacterial flora of the European lobster (Homarus vulgaris L.) and its susceptibility of Gaffkaemia. Aquaculture, 1:193–197.
9. Håstein T, Roald SO, Kjos-Hansen B, Staveland K (1977) Occurrence of Gaffkaemia in lobsters in Norway. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 18:138–139.
10. Hepper BT, Gough CJ (1978) Fecundity and rate of embryonic development of the lobster, Homarus gammarus (L), off the coast of North Wales. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 38:54–57.
11. Debuse VJ, Addison JT, Reynolds JD (1999) The effects of sex ratio on sexual competition in the European lobster. Animal Behaviour, 58:973–981.
12. Debuse VJ, Addison JT, Reynolds JD (2003) Effects of breeding site density on competition and sexual selection in the European lobster. Behavioral Ecology, 14:396–402.
13. Browne R, Benavente GP, Uglem I, Balsa JCM, Browne R (2009) An illustrated hatchery guide for the production of clawed lobsters: (using a green water technique). Dún Laoghaire: Bord Iascaigh Mhara.
14. Beard TW, Richards PR, Wickins JF (1985) The techniques and practicability of year-round production of lobsters, Homarus gammarus (L.), in laboratory recirculation systems. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Directorate of Fisheries Research, p. 22.
15. Lucien-Brun H, van Wormhoudt A, Lachaux A, Ceccaldi HJ (1985) Effects of compounded diets on the growth of juvenile lobsters, Homarus gammarus L.: biochemical estimate of the optimum protein composition of the diet. Aquaculture, 46:97–109.
17. Attramadal KJ, Øien JV, Kristensen E, Evjemo JO, Kjørsvik E, Vadstein O, Bakke I (2021) UV treatment in RAS influences the rearing water microbiota and reduces the survival of European lobster larvae (Homarus gammarus). Aquacultural Engineering, 94:102176.
18. Carere C, Nascetti G, Carlini A, Santucci D, Alleva E (2015) Actions for restocking of the European lobster (Homarus gammarus): a case study on the relevance of behaviour and welfare assessment of cultured juveniles. Rendiconti Lincei, 26:59–64.
19. Aspaas S, Grefsrud ES, Fernö A, Jensen KH, Trengereid H, Agnalt AL (2016) An enriched environment promotes shelter-seeking behaviour and survival of hatchery-produced juvenile European lobster (Homarus gammarus). PLOS ONE, 11:e0159807.
20. Wickins JF (1986) Stimulation of crusher claw development in cultured lobsters, Homarus gammarus (L.). Aquaculture Research, 17:267–273.
21. van der Meeren GI, Uksnøy LE (2000) A comparison of claw morphology and dominance between wild and cultivated male European lobster. Aquaculture International, 8:77–94.
22. Latini L, Nascetti G, Grignani G, Bello E, Polverino G, Canestrelli D, Carere C (2023) Limited holding space reduces growth and behavioural performance in juvenile European lobsters. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 266:106013.
23. Schmalenbach I, Buchholz F (2013) Effects of temperature on the moulting and locomotory activity of hatchery-reared juvenile lobsters (Homarus gammarus) at Helgoland (North Sea). Marine Biology Research, 9:19–26.
24. van der Meeren GI (2005) Potential of ecological studies to improve survival of cultivated and released European lobsters, Homarus gammarus. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 39:399–424.
25. Addison JT, Bannister RCA (1994) Re-stocking and enhancement of clawed lobster stocks: a review. Crustaceana, 67:131–155.
26. Whiteley NM, Al‐Wassia AH, Taylor EW (1995) The effects of sudden changes in temperature on aquatic and aerial respiration in the lobster, Homarus gammarus (L.). Marine & Freshwater Behaviour & Physiology, 27:13–27.
27. Linnane A, Uglem I, Grimsen S, Mercer JP (1997) Survival and cheliped loss of juvenile lobsters Homarus gammarus during simulated out‐of‐water transport. The Progressive Fish‐Culturist, 59:47–53.
28. van der Meeren GI (1991) Out-of-water transportation effects on behaviour in newly released juvenile Atlantic lobsters Homarus gammarus. Aquacultural Engineering, 10:55–64.
29. Mackie AM, Shelton RGJ (1972) A whole-animal bioassay for the determination of the food attractants of the lobster Homarus gammarus. Marine Biology, 14:217–221.
30. Mehrtens F, Stolpmann M, Buchholz F, Hagen W, Saborowski R (2005) Locomotory activity and exploration behaviour of juvenile European lobsters (Homarus gammarus) in the laboratory. Marine and Freshwater Behaviour and Physiology, 38:105–116.
31. Schmalenbach I, Mehrtens F, Janke M, Buchholz F (2011) A mark-recapture study of hatchery-reared juvenile European lobsters, Homarus gammarus, released at the rocky island of Helgoland (German Bight, North Sea) from 2000 to 2009. Fisheries Research, 108:22–30.
32. Moland E, Ulmestrand M, Olsen EM, Stenseth NC (2013) Long-term decrease in sex-specific natural mortality of European lobster within a marine protected area. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 491:153–164.
33. Amelot M, Normand J, Schlaich I, Ernande B (2024) Spillover and competitive exclusion in the crustacean community following the implementation of a marine reserve. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 81:1827–1836.
34. Ferrero EA, Privileggi N, Scovacricchi T, Van Der Meeren G (2002) Does lunar cycle affect clawed lobster egg hatching and moulting frequency of hatchery-reared juveniles?. Ophelia, 56:13-22.
35. Wahle RA, Steneck RS (1991) Recruitment habitats and nursery grounds of the American lobster Homarus americanus: a demographic bottleneck? Marine Ecology Progress Series, 69:231–243. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24816835
36. Moland E, Carlson SM, Villegas-Ríos D, Wiig JR, Olsen EM (2019) Harvest selection on multiple traits in the wild revealed by aquatic animal telemetry. Ecology and Evolution, 9:5708–5718.
37. Bannister RCA, Addison JT, Lovewell SRJ (1994) Growth, movement, recapture rate and survival of hatchery-reared lobsters (Homarus gammarus (Linnaeus, 1758)) released into the wild on the English east coast. Crustaceana, 67:156–172.
38. Davies CE, Wootton EC (2018) Current and emerging diseases of the European lobster (Homarus gammarus): a review. Bulletin of Marine Science, 94:959–978.
39. Skerritt DJ, Robertson PA, Mill AC, Polunin NV, Fitzsimmons C (2015) Fine-scale movement, activity patterns and home-ranges of European lobster Homarus gammarus. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 536:203–219.
40. Moksness E, Støle R, van der Meeren G (1998) Profitability analysis of sea ranching with Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus), and European lobster (Homarus gammarus) in Norway. Bulletin of Marine Science, 62:689–699.
41. Agnalt AL (2008) Fecundity of the European lobster (Homarus gammarus) off southwestern Norway after stock enhancement: do cultured females produce as many eggs as wild females? ICES Journal of Marine Science, 65:164–170.
42. Sheehy MRJ, Bannister RCA, Wickins JF, Shelton PMJ (1999) New perspectives on the growth and longevity of the European lobster (Homarus gammarus). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 56:1904–1915.
43. Uglem I, Nœss H, Farestveit E, Jørstad KE (1996) Tagging of juvenile lobsters (Homarus gammarus (L.)) with visible implant fluorescent elastomer tags. Aquacultural Engineering, 15:499–501.
44. Walker RS (1986) The first returns of tagged juvenile lobsters (Homarus gammarus (L.)) after release to the wild. Aquaculture, 52:231–233.
45. Bannister RCA & Addison JT (1998) Enhancing Lobster Stocks: A Review of Recent European Methods, Results, and Future Prospects. Bulletin of Marine Science, 62:369-387.
46. National Lobster Hatchery (n.d.) Retrieved April 28, 2025, from https://nationallobsterhatchery.co.uk
47. Blythe J, Cvitanovic C (2020) Five organizational features that enable successful interdisciplinary marine research. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7:539111.
48. Ellis CD, Hodgson DJ, Daniels CL, Collins M, Griffiths AG (2017) Population genetic structure in European lobsters: implications for connectivity, diversity and hatchery stocking. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 563:123–137.
49. De Wit P, Svanberg L, Casties I, Eriksson SP, Sundell K, André C (2022) Single nucleotide polymorphisms are suitable for assessing the success of restocking efforts of the European lobster (Homarus gammarus, L.). Conservation Genetics Resources, 14:47–52.
50. Thébaud O, Nielsen JR, Motova A, Curtis H, Bastardie F, Blomqvist GE, Daurès F, Goti L, Hozer J, Innes J, et al. (2023) Integrating economics into fisheries science and advice: progress, needs, and future opportunities. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 80:647–663.
51. Haugen JB, Cribari K, Bundy A, Hall J, Fulton EA, Haugen JB, Link JS, Dickey-Collas M, Leslie HM, Gentry RR, et al. (2024) Marine ecosystem-based management: challenges remain, yet solutions exist, and progress is occurring. Ocean Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44183-024-00041-1